So, only 1 in five people consistently make money at financial spread betting. How terrible. How very terrible, and you think about that, and you think some more, and then it suddenly...
It suddenly strikes you - as only an epiphany can:
What other form of gambling, of all the forms of gambling you could possibly think of, comes even remotely close to a ratio of "one in five people" walking away, year in year out, as a consistent winner?
Poker? Blackjack? Football betting? Baccarat?
Really? Are you sure about that!? Are you?
Look to the facts please.
Because if you look long enough into the facts -
You might just find, for example, that your chances of being a consistent winner at financial spread betting are about twice your chances of being a consistent winner at the very next best form of gambling (ratio of winners - approx 1:10) - and that's also, once you become skilled at that, which also takes many, many, many years of learning all the nuances of the game.
In other words, you tell us which form of gambling, gives any one of us a greater than 1 in 5 chance of being a consistent winner and I won't be the only one who would start to lose interest in financial spread betting.
So... now, the 'what if' question:
What if, pressure is being put on a certain regulatory body, to try and bring the numbers of consistent winners ...'more into line', with all other forms of gambling (and for obvious reasons)?
It suddenly strikes you - as only an epiphany can:
What other form of gambling, of all the forms of gambling you could possibly think of, comes even remotely close to a ratio of "one in five people" walking away, year in year out, as a consistent winner?
Poker? Blackjack? Football betting? Baccarat?
Really? Are you sure about that!? Are you?
Look to the facts please.
Because if you look long enough into the facts -
You might just find, for example, that your chances of being a consistent winner at financial spread betting are about twice your chances of being a consistent winner at the very next best form of gambling (ratio of winners - approx 1:10) - and that's also, once you become skilled at that, which also takes many, many, many years of learning all the nuances of the game.
In other words, you tell us which form of gambling, gives any one of us a greater than 1 in 5 chance of being a consistent winner and I won't be the only one who would start to lose interest in financial spread betting.
So... now, the 'what if' question:
What if, pressure is being put on a certain regulatory body, to try and bring the numbers of consistent winners ...'more into line', with all other forms of gambling (and for obvious reasons)?
What if?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire